Lauren Buck
Rachel McDonnell
ABSTRACT
Virtual reality (VR) has experienced exponential growth in attention in the past five years. Many see it as a new communication mechanism through which people can come together in a way they have never been able to via traditional online interfaces. However, much is still unknown about how VR may affect how groups of users communicate. In this work, we present preliminary findings on how avatars, the customization choices users make to create them, and user perception of them may affect feelings of work group inclusion. We study this in the context of a formal classroom setting with work groups comprised of students. Avatars are known to transform user perception and behavior in virtual environments – both immersive and non-immersive – and can dictate the way social interactions play out in these scenarios. We produce results that align with this paradigm, showing that elements of work group inclusion are different between the physical world and VR, and that customization choices and user perceptions of avatars may shape the perception of inclusion.
- Lillemor Adrianson and Erland Hjelmquist. 1991. Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Behaviour & Information Technology 10, 4 (1991), 281–296.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Katherine Bessière, A Fleming Seay, and Sara Kiesler. 2007. The ideal elf: Identity exploration in World of Warcraft. Cyberpsychology & behavior 10, 4 (2007), 530–535.Google Scholar
- Yulong Bian, Chao Zhou, Yu Tian, Peng Wang, and Fengqiang Gao. 2015. The proteus effect: Influence of avatar appearance on social interaction in virtual environments. In HCI International 2015-Posters’ Extended Abstracts: International Conference, HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 2-7, 2015. Proceedings, Part II 17. Springer, 78–83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jemima Bidee, Tim Vantilborgh, Roland Pepermans, Jurgen Willems, Marc Jegers, and Joeri Hofmans. 2017. Daily motivation of volunteers in healthcare organizations: relating team inclusion and intrinsic motivation using self-determination theory. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 26, 3 (2017), 325–336.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beth G Chung, Karen H Ehrhart, Lynn M Shore, Amy E Randel, Michelle A Dean, and Uma Kedharnath. 2020. Work group inclusion: Test of a scale and model. Group & Organization Management 45, 1 (2020), 75–102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Claudia de Armas, Romero Tori, and Antonio Valerio Netto. 2020. Use of virtual reality simulators for training programs in the areas of security and defense: a systematic review. Multimedia Tools and Applications 79 (2020), 3495–3515.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicolas Ducheneaut, Ming-Hui Wen, Nicholas Yee, and Greg Wadley. 2009. Body and mind: a study of avatar personalization in three virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1151–1160.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernardo M Ferdman, Avi Avigdor, Deborah Braun, Jennifer Konkin, and Daniel Kuzmycz. 2010. Collective experience of inclusion, diversity, and performance in work groups. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie 11 (2010), 6–26.Google Scholar
- Ylva Ferstl, Elena Kokkinara, and Rachel Mcdonnell. 2017. Facial features of non-player creatures can influence moral decisions in video games. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 15, 1 (2017), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Samuel D Gosling, Peter J Rentfrow, and William B Swann Jr. 2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in personality 37, 6 (2003), 504–528.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eugy Han, Mark R Miller, Cyan DeVeaux, Hanseul Jun, Kristine L Nowak, Jeffrey T Hancock, Nilam Ram, and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2023. People, places, and time: a large-scale, longitudinal study of transformed avatars and environmental context in group interaction in the metaverse. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 28, 2 (2023), zmac031.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laura Hoffmann, Nina Haferkamp, Jennifer Klatt, Anh Lam-Chi, and Nicole C Krämer. 2012. A matter of perspective: The impact of first-and third-person perspective on the perception of virtual group discussions. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 4, 3 (2012), 239–257.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kathrin Kirchner and Britta Nordin Forsberg. 2021. A Conference Goes Virtual: Lessons from Creating a Social Event in the Virtual Reality. In Innovations for Community Services: 21st International Conference, I4CS 2021, Bamberg, Germany, May 26–28, 2021, Proceedings 21. Springer, 123–134.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ann Lantz. 2001. Meetings in a distributed group of experts: Comparing face-to-face, chat and collaborative virtual environments. Behaviour & Information Technology 20, 2 (2001), 111–117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rachel McDonnell, Martin Breidt, and Heinrich H Bülthoff. 2012. Render me real? Investigating the effect of render style on the perception of animated virtual humans. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31, 4 (2012), 1–11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R Randall McKnight, Christian A Pean, J Stewart Buck, John S Hwang, Joseph R Hsu, and Sarah N Pierrie. 2020. Virtual reality and augmented reality—translating surgical training into surgical technique. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 13 (2020), 663–674.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ivan Moser, Sandra Chiquet, Sebastian K Strahm, Fred W Mast, and Per Bergamin. 2020. Group decision-making in multi-user immersive virtual reality. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 23, 12 (2020), 846–853.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anna Samira Praetorius and Daniel Görlich. 2020. How avatars influence user behavior: a review on the proteus effect in virtual environments and video games. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 1–9.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holly Maxwell Pringle. 2015. Conjuring the ideal self: An investigation of self-presentation in video game avatars. Press Start 2, 1 (2015), 1–20.Google Scholar
- Rabindra Ratan, David Beyea, Benjamin J Li, and Luis Graciano. 2020. Avatar characteristics induce users’ behavioral conformity with small-to-medium effect sizes: a meta-analysis of the proteus effect. Media Psychology 23, 5 (2020), 651–675.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lynn M Shore, Amy E Randel, Beth G Chung, Michelle A Dean, Karen Holcombe Ehrhart, and Gangaram Singh. 2011. Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of management 37, 4 (2011), 1262–1289.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mel Slater, Amela Sadagic, Martin Usoh, and Ralph Schroeder. 2000. Small-group behavior in a virtual and real environment: A comparative study. Presence 9, 1 (2000), 37–51.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chee-Meng Yap, Kah-Hin Chai, and Patrick Lemaire. 2005. An empirical study on functional diversity and innovation in SMEs. Creativity and Innovation Management 14, 2 (2005), 176–190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nick Yee and Jeremy Bailenson. 2007. The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human communication research 33, 3 (2007), 271–290.Google Scholar
- He Zhao, Qin Heng Zhao, and Beata Ślusarczyk. 2019. Sustainability and digitalization of corporate management based on augmented/virtual reality tools usage: China and other world IT companies’ experience. Sustainability 11, 17 (2019), 4717.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katja Zibrek and Rachel McDonnell. 2014. Does render style affect perception of personality in virtual humans?. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on applied perception. 111–115.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Avatar Customization, Personality, and the Perception of Work Group Inclusion in Immersive Virtual Reality
Recommendations
The effect of avatar realism in immersive social virtual realities
VRST '17: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and TechnologyThis paper investigates the effect of avatar realism on embodiment and social interactions in Virtual Reality (VR). We compared abstract avatar representations based on a wooden mannequin with high fidelity avatars generated from photogrammetry 3D scan ...
I feel for my avatar: embodied perception in VEs
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsVisual perception is dependent upon one's physical state. The apparent inclination of a hill is overestimated when the observer is carrying a heavy backpack. But, what if the hill is a virtual one and the user is about to navigate the virtual ...
Visualizing the keyboard in virtual reality for enhancing immersive experience
SIGGRAPH '17: ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 PostersRecently, virtual reality (VR) becomes more and more popular and provides users an immersive experience with a head-mounted display (HMD). However, in some applications, users have to interact with physical objects while immersed in VR. With a non-see-...
Comments